I-502 in Washington State

You’re hip to initiative 502, right? Oh, I can understand if you aren’t. Several states currently have cannabis legalization initiatives in process. It can be tough keeping up. Washington’s 502 will go to the voters.

And I haven’t decided, yet, how I’ll vote.

Drift, you’re thinking, how could you not vote for cannabis legalization?!

Well… I’m thinking 502 has a few problems.

The passing of 502 would legalize possession of one ounce or less of usable cannabis, 16 ounces of cannabis infused foods and 72 ounces of infused liquids; for those over 21-years of age. It seems okay on the face of it, eh? Let’s look at what I believe to be a few issues.

502 does not legalize home cultivation. So where would a person purchase their recreational cannabis? The initiative is set up so that distribution would be through privately operated cannabis stores regulated by the state liquor control board. With the voters recently deciding the state will no longer be in the liquor business, I’m not sure the liquor board will exist soon. Let’s ignore that for now.

What we do know is the growers, processors and retailers would be licensed and regulated by the state. That means, state employees would be involved in the distribution of a schedule I drug. That’s a problem. Maybe.

You may recall that Governor Gregoire vetoed all sections of recently passed legislation (see 5073) that had anything to do with state employees involvement with cannabis. She did so (so she’s said, anyway) due to threats of prosecution made by federal attorneys.

So, the State’s involvement could be an issue. Yeah, yeah, go ahead and scream “10th amendment!” That won’t change the harsh reality of the federal government’s attitude about enforcing the CSA however.

The products are to be levied a 25% tax all along the distribution line. Grower to processor, 25%. Processor to retailer, 25%. Retailer to consumer, 25%. Yep, that’s a hell of a lot’a taxing. Here’s a chart from the New Approach Washington (initiative originators) website:


Now, I’m not sure if that’s telling me an ounce of cannabis would sell for $325 or $445. I don’t know that it matters. Well, maybe it does matter because I don’t believe $325 is competitive with the black-market. If a person can buy an ounce from their pot dealing buddy for $275 why the Hell would they buy it from a store? Oh, sure, the stores’ products will have had some sort of production oversight, but still…

502 doesn’t repeal Washington’s medicinal cannabis laws, but some say it would impact patients with a doctor’s recommendation. 502 has a provision that states 5 ng/ml of THC in the blood constitutes driving under the influence. 5 ng/ml is something someone pulled out of their ass. There is absolutely no science that tells us a person with that amount of THC is impaired. Actually, studies indicate 5 ng/ml is way too low.

Folks whom utilize medicinal cannabis could well have more than 5 ng/ml when they climb out of bed in the morning. That is, more than the law would allow, and not be impaired in the least.

Now, please don’t misunderstand, I’m not in favor of people getting behind the wheel while under the influence of anything. The thing is, though, if the law is going to state a given THC load is prima facie evidence of impairment, shouldn’t that amount be based upon… something?

Yeah, 502 has a few rough spots. But then, what if Washington State became the first to legalize (for some value of) possession and recreational use of cannabis? Would other states follow. Would the will of the people win out over the will of corporate America?

Maybe I’ll flip a coin, then vote.



  1. Gator said,

    February 19, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    Dunno CD! looks like Corporate America is gonna try to help get it legalized so as they don’t miss out on that dollar what?

  2. Gator said,

    February 19, 2012 at 9:58 pm

    So somewhere down the road I see a sign as your zippin down the pike in yer lectrik cyckle from punjabi india that says “200 Dollar fine for tossing seeds on the side of the road”. hehe.
    Everyone has to have an income!

  3. capndrift said,

    February 20, 2012 at 6:22 am

    Corporate America will work toward the legalization of phytocannabinoid formulations. I’ve mentioned GW Pharmaceuticals here in several places. They aren’t the only drug outfit hussling for position in the coming market.

    Processes and formulations can be patented. Hell, believe it or not, plant strains can be patented (see Monsanto). No patent, no profits.

    It’s going to take some real pressure to get private horticulture legalized. Currently, an individual in Washington State (with a recommendation) can basically brew up Sativex® in their kitchen. Okay, with the help of professional analysis (mass spectrometry, etc). There’s a lab or two up around the Seattle area that will perform that work. Still, what I’m saying is, that would be affecting GW’s (and the like) bottom line.

    No man, I disagree. Corporate America does -not- want cannabis legalized.

    • Gator said,

      February 23, 2012 at 11:37 pm

      you should write up a book of your rants and have it published! hehe

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: